FLEURIME v. STATE (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Siril FLEURIME, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80340

Decided: January 16, 2018

Before Division Two: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Appellant Siril Fleurime (“Fleurime”) is appealing the denial of his Amended Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Fleurime sought to vacate his guilty plea and sentence for a class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree, section 565.072, and armed criminal action, section 571.015. Fleurime's 24.035 motion alleges that his statements at his plea hearing called into question whether he acted “knowingly” when he committed the offenses. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law