FLEURIME v. STATE (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Siril FLEURIME, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80340

Decided: January 16, 2018

Before Division Two: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Appellant Siril Fleurime (“Fleurime”) is appealing the denial of his Amended Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Fleurime sought to vacate his guilty plea and sentence for a class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree, section 565.072, and armed criminal action, section 571.015. Fleurime's 24.035 motion alleges that his statements at his plea hearing called into question whether he acted “knowingly” when he committed the offenses. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network