STATE OF MISSOURI v. KENNETH BUCKHOLZ (2017)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. KENNETH M. BUCKHOLZ, Appellant.

WD79334

Decided: March 15, 2017

Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge

Attorneys: Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent Attorneys: Kenneth M. Buckholz, Appellant Pro Se, Counsel for Appellant

ORDER

Kenneth Buckholz (“Buckholz”) appeals the trial court's decision to deny his 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Buckholz argues that the trial court erred in denying his 29.07(d) motion because the plea was entered unknowingly and involuntarily in that the plea trial court breached the plea agreement by never stating whether it would or would not accept the agreement, but instead sentenced the appellant to more time than was agreed to by Buckholz and the State. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network