LLC v. Redina Burge and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. (2017)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Propulsion Controls Company, LLC., Appellant, v. Redina Burge and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

WD 79368

Decided: January 24, 2017

Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

Attorneys: Casey P. Murray, Kansas City, MO for appellant, Bart A. Matanic for respondent State of Missouri; Redina Burge, acting pro se

ORDER

Redina Burge applied for unemployment benefits after her employment with Propulsion Control Company, LLC was terminated in July 2015. Propulsion protested the claim on the basis that Burge had been discharged for misconduct. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found that Burge's termination was not for misconduct connected with work, and that she was therefore eligible for unemployment benefits. Propulsion appeals, arguing that the Commission's decision is not supported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law