LAWRENCE NEAL v. STATE OF MISSOURI (2016)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

LAWRENCE NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

WD78700

Decided: November 29, 2016

BEFORE DIVISION TWO: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, PRESIDING JUDGE, KAREN KING MITCHELL AND ANTHONY REX GABBERT, JUDGES

Attorneys: Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, and Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City,MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Lawrence Neal appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the post-conviction judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a formal published opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network