Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.M. (Mother) and E.M. (Father), Appellants. (2015)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the Interest of: N.M. and D.M.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.M. (Mother) and E.M. (Father), Appellants.

WD 78488

Decided: August 25, 2015

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and James E. Welsh, Judge

Edward E. Moore, Kansas City, MO, for respondent. Dana M. Outlaw, Lee's Summit, MO, for appellants.

ORDER

The parents of two children appeal a judgment terminating their parental rights, arguing that no substantial evidence was presented showing that termination of parental rights was in the children's best interests. Because substantial evidence was presented which supports the trial court's conclusion that termination of parental rights was in the children's best interests, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network