Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Alphonse D. Jackson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Order
Alphonse D. Jackson appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. On appeal, Mr. Jackson claims that the circuit court clearly erred in denying his motion because his trial counsel was ineffective. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memorandum of law to the parties explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Per Curiam:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD 77397
Decided: June 30, 2015
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)