State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Koster, Missouri Attorney General, Respondent, v. Samuel Martin, Appellant (2015)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Koster, Missouri Attorney General, Respondent, v. Samuel Martin, Appellant

WD 77240

Decided: March 17, 2015

Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

Michael D. Morris, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Samuel D. Martin, Appellant Pro Se.

Samuel D. Martin's inmate account is currently subject to the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act. He seeks to set aside the original judgment as void under Rule 74.06(b)(4). The trial court held that jurisdiction was proper in the original judgment and that adequate due process was afforded. Martin brings this appeal to challenge the trial court's denial of his motion to set aside the previous judgment. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network