Gwynne R. McGraw, Respondent, v. Eric J. McGraw, Appellant. (2014)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Gwynne R. McGraw, Respondent, v. Eric J. McGraw, Appellant.

WD 76939

Decided: December 30, 2014

Before Division Two: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, James E. Welsh, Judge and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

Allen S. Russell, for Respondent Mark J. Murphy, for Appellant

ORDER

Eric McGraw appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for entry of judgment nunc pro tunc. On appeal Eric McGraw argues the trial court erred in not admitting evidence that allegedly showed that the judgment contained a clerical mistake. He argues that the evidence was admissible and not in violation of the rule against parol evidence because evidence of mistake or inadvertence is an exception to the rule. Eric McGraw also contends that extrinsic evidence was admissible because the judgment was ambiguous. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network