Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
In the Interest of: J.H.C., Plaintiff, B.M.P. and K.G.P., Respondents, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, Missouri Children's Division, Respondent, v. J.M.R.C., Appellant.
ORDER
J.M.R. (Mother) appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her son, J.H.C. (Child). She raises two points on appeal arguing that the trial court's decision was not supported by clear, cogent and convincing evidence because it relied only on Mother's past behavior and did not consider whether that behavior indicated future harm and did not consider her conduct and participation at the time of the termination hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD 77583
Decided: December 23, 2014
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)