John H. Gunn, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. (2014)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

John H. Gunn, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 77109

Decided: December 16, 2014

BEFORE DIVISION ONE: THOMAS H. NEWTON, PRESIDING JUDGE, LISA WHITE HARDWICK AND ANTHONY REX GABBERT, JUDGES

John H. Gunn, Jefferson City, MO, appellant pro se, for appellant. Jennifer Rodewald, Jefferson City, for respondent, for respondent.

Order

John Gunn appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of second-degree burglary and first-degree robbery. Gunn contends the judge erred in not recusing himself from the post-conviction proceedings; the court erred in not disqualifying the public defender from representing him in the post-conviction proceedings; and the court, the prosecutor, and his post-conviction counsel denied him the ability to raise all of his pro se Rule 29.15 claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network