State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dustin Allen Tietge, Appellant. (2014)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dustin Allen Tietge, Appellant.

WD 76113

Decided: November 25, 2014

Before Division Two: Gary D. Witt, P.J., and Lisa White Hardwick and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

Andrew C. Hooper, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant. Stephen M. Murrell, Glasgow, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Following a bench trial, Dustin Tietge was convicted in the Circuit Court of Pettis County of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, distribute, and sell, in violation of § 195.211, RSMo and of second-degree drug trafficking in violation of § 195.223, RSMo. Tietge appeals, contending that the methamphetamine discovered on his person during a traffic stop should have been suppressed as evidence, because it was discovered during an unlawful search. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting for the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network