Kenneth Washam, Appellant v. Amy H. Hartsfield, et al., Respondents (2014)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Kenneth Washam, Appellant v. Amy H. Hartsfield, et al., Respondents

WD 77260

Decided: November 18, 2014

Before Division Two: Joseph M. Ellis, Presiding, Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge

Kenneth Washam, Appellant Pro-se Clinton Adams, Jr., for Respondents

ORDER

Appellant Kenneth Washam appeals pro se from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County in favor of Respondents Amy and Wallace Hartsfield. The circuit court entered the judgment following a trial de novo on a small claims property dispute between Appellant and Respondents. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network