ELMER TATUM v. << (2012)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ELMER L. TATUM, Appellant.

WD73243

Decided: May 01, 2012

Before Division Two: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis,

Richard A. Starnes, for Respondent Amy B. Meyers, for Appellant

The Circuit Court of Randolph County, Missouri

The Honorable Gary G. Sprick, Judge

Division Two: Gary D. Witt, P.J., Joseph M. Ellis and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.

O R D E R

Lance Livingston appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reason for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Appeal from:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network