DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY v. << (2011)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

WD72837

Decided: October 25, 2011

Before Division Three: Joseph M. Ellis, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard,

Jeannie D. Mitchell, for Respondent

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission

Division Three: Joseph M. Ellis, P.J., Victor C. Howard and Thomas H. Newton, JJ.

Pro-se

O R D E R

Appellant Dennis Bradford appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his application for unemployment benefits pursuant to § 288.050 based upon a finding that he had been discharged for misconduct connected with his work. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission's order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Appeal from:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network