STATE OF MISSOURI CHRIS KOSTER MISSOURI ATTORNEY GENERAL v. JOHN HUDDLESTON (2010)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. CHRIS KOSTER, MISSOURI ATTORNEY GENERAL Appellant, v. JOHN Q. HUDDLESTON, Respondent.

WD71458

Decided: December 14, 2010

Before: Mark D. Pfeiffer, P.J., and Victor C. Howard and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

Laura E. Elsbury, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for appellant. David B. Mandelbaum, Esq., Leawood, KS, for respondent.

ORDER

The State of Missouri appeals a judgment entered in favor of inmate-defendant John Q. Huddleston in proceedings under the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act, §§ 217.825-217.841, RSMo (“MIRA”). On appeal, the State raises the same issues concerning the interpretation of MIRA's homestead exemption, § 217.827(1)(b)a, RSMo, as it raised in State ex rel. Koster v. Quick, No. WD71459, also decided today. Based on our decision in Quick, and as more fully explained in an unpublished memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

The Honorable John E. Beetem, Judge

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network