Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: THE ADOPTIONS OF: H.J.C., K.F.C., P.M.C., AND R.E.C., Juveniles; G.L. AND M.L., Respondents, v. J.C., Appellant.
ORDER
Mother appeals from the termination of her parental rights. On appeal, she argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court's determinations under section 211.447.5(2) and section 211.447.5(3). The judgment is affirmed. A published opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
Per Curiam:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD87801, WD87803
Decided: October 21, 2025
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)