IN THE INTEREST OF AND JUVENILE OFFICER v. L.H., Appellant. (2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.H., L.H., D.H., AND A.H.; JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondents, v. L.H., Appellant.

WD87774

Decided: October 21, 2025

Before Division One: Janet Sutton, Presiding Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

Attorneys: James R. Hobbs, Sheena A. Foye, Kansas City, for Appellant, Michael A. Herrin, Lori L. Stipp, Monica D. Hutchinson-Penrose, Kansas City, for Respondent.

ORDER

L.H. (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court's judgment terminating her parental rights to C.H., A.H., D.H., and L.H. Mother argues the trial court erred in terminating her parental rights pursuant to sections 211.447.5(2) (abuse and neglect), 211.447.5(3) (failure to rectify), 211.447.5(5)(a) (unfitness), and 211.447.7 (best interests) because there was insufficient evidence to establish same. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law