Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
In the INTEREST OF: A.W.T. & J.A.H.; Tobie Meyer, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. J.H., Father, Appellant.
ORDER
J.H. appeals from the trial court's judgments terminating his parental rights to A.W.T. and J.A.H. Father argues that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because substantial evidence did not support the trial court's conclusions that Father abandoned, abused, or neglected A.W.T. and J.A.H., and that terminating his parental rights is in the best interest of A.W.T. and J.A.H. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Per Curiam:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD 87321 Consolidated with WD 87322
Decided: March 25, 2025
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)