STATE v. WOOLFORD (2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Faith D. WOOLFORD, Appellant.

WD 86955

Decided: March 25, 2025

Before Division Four: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Chief Judge, Presiding, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Wensdai Brooks, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Katharine Curry, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

ORDER

Faith D. Woolford was convicted of assault in the third degree following a jury trial. On appeal, Woolford challenges the admission of testimony about the content of notes made by a 911 dispatcher, claiming the testimony was inadmissible hearsay, and that had the evidence been excluded, there is a reasonable probability the outcome of her trial would have been different. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network