STATE v. WOOLFORD (2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Faith D. WOOLFORD, Appellant.

WD 86955

Decided: March 25, 2025

Before Division Four: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Chief Judge, Presiding, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Wensdai Brooks, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Katharine Curry, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

ORDER

Faith D. Woolford was convicted of assault in the third degree following a jury trial. On appeal, Woolford challenges the admission of testimony about the content of notes made by a 911 dispatcher, claiming the testimony was inadmissible hearsay, and that had the evidence been excluded, there is a reasonable probability the outcome of her trial would have been different. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law