J.A.S. and P.A.S., Respondents, v. A.R., Appellant. (2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF: A.M.R.R., Respondent, J.A.S. and P.A.S., Respondents, v. A.R., Appellant.

WD 87181

Decided: February 19, 2025

Division Three: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge, Karen King Mitchell, Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, for Respondents. Kole S. Masters, for Appellant.

ORDER

A.R. appeals the judgment of the trial court which terminated A.R.’s parental rights to A.M.R.R., a minor child. A.R. raises four Points on Appeal, asserting the trial court was without sufficient evidence to support the statutory grounds for termination and abused its discretion in making the best interests of Child finding. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network