BRINKOETTER v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE (2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Heather BRINKOETTER, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.

WD 86878

Decided: January 21, 2025

Division Two: Alok Ahuja, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

Jeffrey S. Eastman, Gladstone, for Appellant Joseph Findley, for Respondent Marcie W. Bower, Co-Counsel for Respondent

ORDER

Heather Brinkoetter appeals from the trial court's judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue's revocation of her driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical test of her breath. Brinkoetter raises one Point on Appeal, asserting the trial court erred in affirming the revocation because the Director failed to sustain its burden to prove that the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that Brinkoetter was intoxicated. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network