BIBBY v. STATE (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Joseph BIBBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 86596

Decided: December 03, 2024

Before Division Four: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Chief Judge, Presiding, Karen King Mitchell and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

Tyler Ludwig, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Andrew Bailey, Attorney General, Daniel McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Order

Joseph Bibby appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Bibby raises a single claim on appeal. He argues that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to request a change of venue and that, had counsel sought and obtained a change of venue, Bibby would not have been convicted. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network