STATE v. CHEATHAM (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cheswick S. CHEATHAM, Appellant.

WD 86615

Decided: November 26, 2024

Before Division Three: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge, and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

Ellen Flottman, Columbia, MO counsel for Appellant. Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Cheswick Cheatham appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree, unlawful use of a weapon, and stealing. In his sole point on appeal, Cheatham contends that the trial court plainly erred in permitting the prosecutors to personalize their arguments to the jury. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network