MARSH v. STATE (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Cody S. MARSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 86111

Decided: October 22, 2024

Before Division Four: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Chief Judge, Presiding, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge

Damien S. De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Cody Marsh appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends the circuit court clearly erred in, 1) finding Marsh's trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective in failing to object to the jury having unrestricted access to Victim's CPC interview, and 2) finding Marsh's appellate counsel was not constitutionally ineffective in raising a deficient and frivolous sufficiency claim. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law