MARSH v. STATE (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Cody S. MARSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 86111

Decided: October 22, 2024

Before Division Four: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Chief Judge, Presiding, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge

Damien S. De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Cody Marsh appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends the circuit court clearly erred in, 1) finding Marsh's trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective in failing to object to the jury having unrestricted access to Victim's CPC interview, and 2) finding Marsh's appellate counsel was not constitutionally ineffective in raising a deficient and frivolous sufficiency claim. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network