WALKER v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Angela WALKER, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents.

WD 86713

Decided: September 10, 2024

Before Division Two: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge Karen King Mitchell and Janet Sutton, Judges

Angela Walker, Jefferson City, MO, Pro-Se Appellant. Ethan T. Sellers, Scott R. Pool, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondents.

Order

Angela Walker, who appears pro se, appeals from the judgment dismissing, with prejudice, her claims against Missouri Vocational Enterprises and the Missouri Department of Corrections (collectively, DOC). Walker raises five points on appeal. She argues the motion court erred in dismissing her claims because (1) the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to her claims for discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful discharge; (2) her claims for unlawful discriminatory practices, unlawful business practices, and retaliation were not barred by the applicable statutes of limitations; (3) her petition properly stated a claim for libel; (4) her fraud claim was properly pleaded; and (5) her claim for discrimination was not time barred. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law