CLARK v. STATE (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dion M. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 86151

Decided: July 30, 2024

Before Division One: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

Kent E. Gipson, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Richard Anthony Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Dion Clark appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel due to his trial counsel's failure to object to the admission of evidence of drugs found in a vehicle he did not own but in which he was riding at the time Victim was shot, and due to counsel's failure to impeach Victim with prior inconsistent statements about whether the vehicle door was open or closed when Victim was shot. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network