Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Benjamin Joseph ARMSTRONG, Appellant.
ORDER
Benjamin Joseph Armstrong (“Armstrong”) was convicted of unlawful use of a weapon and harassment in the second degree following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Pettis County (“trial court”). Armstrong raises one point on appeal. He claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal, accepting the jury's verdict for the count of unlawful use of a weapon, and entering sentence and judgment on said count, because there was insufficient evidence that the pocketknife possessed by Armstrong was “readily capable of lethal use,” an element of the offense of unlawful use of a weapon. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).
PER CURIAM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: WD 85965
Decided: July 30, 2024
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)