KEVIN HAMILTON v. STATE OF MISSOURI (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

KEVIN R. HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

WD85903

Decided: March 05, 2024

Before Division One: Alok Ahuja, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge, and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

Attorneys: Damien de Loyola, Kansas City, MO counsel for appellant. Evan Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO counsel for respondent.

ORDER

Kevin Hamilton appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cass County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when trial counsel failed to object to the verdict director on the ground that it contained a date range that was too broad. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law