GILBERT v. STATE (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Abraham GILBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 85750

Decided: January 30, 2024

Division Four: Gary D. Witt, Chief Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

Michael K. Hill, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

ORDER

Abraham Gilbert (“Gilbert”) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. On appeal, Gilbert argues that the motion court erred because his trial counsel was ineffective for having unreasonably abandoned a portion of his planned cross-examination of the victim. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network