CRAWLEY v. STATE (2023)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Denico CRAWLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 85906

Decided: August 29, 2023

Before Division Two: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge, Thomas N. Chapman, Judge, and Janet Sutton, Judge

Penny Umstattd-Cope, Columbia, MO counsel for appellant. Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO counsel for respondent.

ORDER

Denico Crawley appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Boone County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to request a change of venue. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law