Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DOCTOR'S MEDICAL CLINIC, et al., pet. Appellants, v. CITY OF JACKSON, Minnesota, d/b/a, Jackson Medical Center, et al., Respondents.
ORDER
In this matter the court reviewed extensive administrative as well as judicial proceedings relating to the termination of medical privileges of appellant Gumersindo A. Alvero, M.D., by respondent Jackson Medical Center. The court of appeals affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment for respondents on the issue of immunity from damages under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 11101-52 (1994) and immunity from equitable relief under Minn.Stat. § 145.63 (1996) and awarded respondents $25,000 in attorney fees on the basis that they were substantially prevailing parties and thus entitled to attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 11113.
Because the court is evenly divided with respect to the issue of immunity, the decision of the court of appeals dated September 30, 1997 is affirmed. With respect to the award of attorney fees, however, after a careful review of the record, we believe that appellants' claims were not frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith as 42 U.S.C. § 11113 requires as a condition for awarding attorney fees and therefore we reverse the court of appeals' affirmance of the district court in this respect.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals dated September 30, 1997 is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz
/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz
/s/ Chief Justice
PAGE, J. took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Nos. C1-97-50, C4-97-527.
Decided: June 26, 1998
Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)