NAEGER v. ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,

Adam NAEGER, Appellant, v. ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

ED 107178

Decided: June 28, 2019

Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

Brian Fellows, Fellows & Blake, LLC, 13421 Manchester Road, Suite 105, St. Louis, MO 63131, for appellant. Michael D. Cerulo, Erica L. Briscoe, Baty, Holm, Nurmich & Otto, P.C., 7711 Bonhomme Ave., Suite 901, St. Louis, MO 63105, for respondent.

ORDER

Adam Naeger (“Naeger”) appeals the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Esurance”). We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law