Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jeff C. TACINA, Appellant, v. JO ANN FABRICS, Respondent.
Jeff Tacina appeals the trial court's judgment following proceedings in small claims court. Because Tacina's notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal.
Background
On March 22, 2019, Tacina filed a petition in small claims court, alleging that Respondent owed him unpaid wages. On June 7, 2019, after hearing the evidence, the trial court ruled in favor of Respondent and dismissed Tacina's petition with prejudice. That same day, Tacina filed an application for trial de novo. On June 17, 2019, the trial court entered a judgment denying his application for trial de novo and dismissing the case with prejudice. More than five months later, on December 2, 2019, Tacina filed a notice of appeal.
Discussion
“This Court only has jurisdiction if [the appellant] filed a timely notice of appeal.” Walker v. Smallwood, 247 S.W.3d 24 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). Under Rule 81.04(a),1 “the notice of appeal must be filed no later than 10 days after the judgment becomes final.” Redden v. Redden, 279 S.W.3d 240, 241 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009). A judgment “becomes final at the expiration of thirty days after its entry if no timely authorized after-trial motion is filed.” Rule 81.05(a)(1).
Here, because Tacina did not file an authorized after-trial motion, the judgment entered on June 17, 2019 became final on July 17, 2019. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was July 29, 2019,2 but Tacina did not file his notice of appeal until December 2, 2019. This Court issued an order directing Tacina to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Tacina's response to the show cause order does not provide a basis recognized under Missouri law for excusing his untimely notice of appeal. Because Tacina's notice of appeal was untimely, we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, we dismiss the appeal.
FOOTNOTES
1. All rule references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2019).
2. Because the deadline fell on a Saturday, the notice of appeal was due on the next business day. Rule 44.01(a).
MICHAEL E. GARDNER, Judge
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., concurs. Philip M. Hess, J., concurs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. ED 108515
Decided: February 23, 2021
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)