MARQUEZ v. STATE (2023)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,

Robert MARQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 111075

Decided: September 26, 2023

Before: Thomas C. Clark II, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and John P. Torbitzky, J.

FOR APPELLANT: Matthew W. Vineyard, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Andrew Bailey, Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

ORDER

Robert Marquez (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion under Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law