AUSTIN v. COSTANTINO (2004)

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Sandra AUSTIN v. Barbara COSTANTINO et al.

Docket No. Yor-03-710.

Decided: July 23, 2004

Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.

David W. Austin, Rumford, for plaintiff. James L. Audiffred, Saco, for defendants.

[¶ 1] Barbara and Donald Costantino appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) granting Sandra Austin an enlargement of time to complete a settlement agreement. Because a final judgment must “adjudicate the respective rights, duties, and liabilities of the various parties,” Murphy v. Maddaus, 2002 ME 24, ¶ 12, 789 A.2d 1281, 1284 (internal quotations omitted), there has been no final judgment, and we dismiss the Costantinos' appeal as interlocutory.

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network