Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
COMMONWEALTH v. MICHAEL MAUNEY.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 23.0
In 2004, the defendant pleaded guilty to second-degree murder, assault with a dangerous weapon, unlawful possession of a firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition. The defendant filed a motion for 730 days of jail credit, which was denied, and he appeals from the order denying that motion.
Given the fact that the defendant was caught with the murder weapon in hand at the murder scene, he pleaded guilty. He was allowed to plead guilty to second-degree murder only if he agreed to serve the maximum sentences allowed by law for his remaining crimes. See G. L. c. 265, § 15B (b) (maximum sentence of five years); G. L. c. 269, § 10 (a) (maximum sentence of five years); G. L. c. 269, § 10 (h) (maximum sentence of two years).
The parties agree that the defendant was statutorily entitled to jail credit for all the time he spent in custody before his guilty plea. See G. L. c. 127, § 129B. Here, the defendant was in pretrial custody from the time of his arrest on August 29, 2001, until he pleaded guilty on December 14, 2004, which was a total of 1,202 days. During that time, he was not serving a sentence for any other crime.
On appeal, the defendant initially claimed he was entitled to 730 days of credit, but the Commonwealth countered that he was only entitled to 472 days of credit because, as the motion judge determined, the defendant already received two years, i.e., 730 days, of credit on his sentence for unlawful possession of ammunition, which was deemed served. However, the motion judge also imposed the remainder of the jail credit, i.e., 472 days, on the same sentence, which made that sentence longer than the maximum amount of time permitted under G. L. c. 269, § 10 (h). In the end, the parties now agree, and we order, that the defendant is entitled to an additional 472 days of credit on the sentence he is currently serving.
The order denying the defendant's motion for jail credit is reversed, and the case is remanded for entry of a new order that the defendant is entitled to 472 days of jail credit.
So ordered.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 23-P-927
Decided: March 07, 2024
Court: Appeals Court of Massachusetts.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)