Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JUSTIN TAFT MERRITT
I agree with much of what Justice Crichton wrote in his dissent. Although permanent disbarment is a severe sanction, it is unfortunately justified in this matter because the respondent filed no response, demonstrated no regret or remorse, and made no restitution. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the sanction imposed by the majority of this court.
WEIMER, C.J., dissenting in part.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2023-B-00134
Decided: May 31, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)