Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John Christopher ALEXANDER
Denied. See per curiam.
The Motion for Dissolution of Consent Interim Suspension is denied at this time. It is troubling that approximately 22 months have passed and ODC has yet to file formal charges against respondent. This is particularly notable given that respondent self-reported the alleged violations and agreed that interim suspension was warranted shortly after the alleged violations. See In re: Alexander, 2019-2016 (La. 1/10/20), 286 So.3d 1040. The efficient administration of the lawyer disciplinary system requires timely adjudication of the merits — especially where there is an order of interim suspension. Nevertheless, in view of the seriousness of the allegations, Interim suspension should not at this time be dissolved, provided that ODC proceeds to file the formal charge and set the case for merits determination before a Hearing Committee.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2019-B-02016
Decided: November 23, 2021
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)