Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Stephen SISTRUNK v. FLORIDA MARINE, LLC and Florida Marine Transporters, LLC
Writ application denied.
I would grant the writ and reinstate the ruling of the trial court. The trial judge is to consider the “manner, conditions, and scope” of the examination. This case is not like Henry v. Barlow. No attorney would be present. Like body cams for police officers, a recording in this case would simply serve the truth. In any event, there is nothing to prevent the applicant from being accompanied at the examination by a friend or family member.
Hughes, J., would grant and assigns reasons.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2020-CC-01228
Decided: December 22, 2020
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)