STATE v. SMITH (2020)

Writ application granted. See per curiam.

Writ granted. The State bears the burden of proving the admissibility of evidence seized without a warrant when the legality of a search or seizure is placed at issue by a motion to suppress evidence. LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 703(D). Based on the testimony of the officers and the bodycam footage admitted into evidence, the trial court found the State's claim of an inventory search to not be credible. The issue of a protective sweep was apparently not raised in the trial court, but would nevertheless not seem to be applicable where, as here, the defendant was in handcuffs in a police car when the search was conducted. Furthermore, the offense for which the defendant was initially stopped in this case was illegally tinted windows, for which no evidence would likely be found in the vehicle.

Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is reversed, the trial court's ruling, granting the defendant's motion to suppress, is reinstated, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PER CURIAM

Crain, J., dissents.