Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael Clinton SULLIVAN v. Martha Adele SULLIVAN
Granted in part. Considering the unique circumstances presented, the judgment of the district court denying relator's motion is vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court for the purpose of conducting a contradictory hearing on the motion on an expedited basis. This hearing may be conducted by telephone, video, teleconferencing, or any other means that do not involve in-person contact, as authorized by this court's order of April 6, 2020 and related orders. In all other respects, the application is denied.
PER CURIAM
Hughes, J., would deny.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 2020-CC-0456
Decided: April 21, 2020
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)