Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth SESSION
Writ denied.
While I agree with the denial of the defendant’s writ application, I write separately to express my serious concern regarding the substantial increase in the amount of defendant’s bail. I vote to deny defendant’s writ application nonetheless because (1) we afford discretion to district courts in fixing bail, as the district court is intimately familiar with the evidence against defendant and any other relevant factors for which bail may be fixed, see C.Cr.P. art. 316, and (2) defendant’s trial is imminent, thus limiting the deprivation of his liberty.
Hughes, J., would grant. Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2019-KK-01705
Decided: October 25, 2019
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)