Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. TRABILLION HAWTHORNE
Applicant initially filed a “shell” application, which did not comply with the content requirements for a writ application set forth in Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, Sections 3 and 4. Applicant later filed a “supplement” to this application that contained the required content. The “shell” application was not a writ application. The “supplement” was filed forty-six days after the appellate court's action in this case. The application was required to be filed within thirty days of the mailing of the notice of the original judgment of the court of appeal, and “[n]o extension of time therefor will be granted.” Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5(a)(1). Because the shell is not an application and the rule does not allow for the deadline to be extended, the writ should not be considered.
Crain, J., concurs with reasons.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2024-KH-01233
Decided: November 27, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)