Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Louisiana v. Demarious HICKS
Writ application granted. See per curiam.
Writ granted. The United States Supreme Court determined in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020), that the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial, as incorporated against the States by way of the Fourteenth Amendment, requires a unanimous verdict to convict a defendant of a serious offense. Here, in a trial conducted after Ramos was decided, the district court instructed jurors that they could reach a verdict by 10-2 vote. However, jurors were not polled and it is not known whether the verdict was unanimous. The erroneous jury instruction alone does not constitute a structural error and defendant must show he suffered harm from it before the conviction will be reversed. See generally State v. Hongo, 96-2060, p. 4 (La. 12/02/97), 706 So.2d 419, 421; see also Weaver v. Massachusetts, 582 U.S. 286, 137 S.Ct. 1899, 198 L.Ed.2d 420 (2017). Accordingly, we grant the State's application and reverse the court of appeal's decision, which set aside the jury's verdict and remanded for a new trial. We reinstate the verdict and remand to the district court, which is ordered to conduct further proceedings to ascertain whether the verdict was unanimous. See generally State v. Norman, 2020-109 (La. 7/2/20), 297 So.3d 738 (per curiam). Thereafter, if the trial court finds no error or that any error was harmless, defendant can appeal that ruling.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
I respectfully dissent and would affirm the court of appeal's decision to order a new trial. More than one year after the United States Supreme Court declared non-unanimous juries unconstitutional in a highly publicized opinion, Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. __, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (2020); the trial court in this matter instructed the jury that only ten votes were required to reach a verdict. Jury unanimity is a bedrock principle of our federal and state constitutions. Id., La. Const. art. I § 17. It is therefore imperative to zealously guard against errors of this magnitude – inadvertent or otherwise.
Griffin, J., dissents and assigns reasons.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2023-K-00969
Decided: February 06, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)