IN RE: CARL HENRY FRANKLIN (2023)

Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam.

JLW

JDH

JTG

JBM

Crichton, J., dissents and would reject the proposed discipline as too harsh.

Crain, J., dissents and would reject the proposed discipline as too harsh.

Griffin, J., dissents and would reject the proposed discipline as too harsh.

Supreme Court of Louisiana October 17, 2023

10/17/23

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

NO. 2023-B-1209

IN RE: CARL HENRY FRANKLIN

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent mishandled his client trust account. Respondent and the ODC then submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that his conduct violated Rules 1.15(a), 1.15(b), 1.15(d) and 1.15(f) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Carl Henry Franklin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 14974, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent's successful completion of a one-year period of supervised probation governed by the conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the probation monitor, and the ODC execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.