IN RE: J. QUENTIN SIMON (2023)

Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam.

Genovese, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

Griffin, J., dissents and would reject the proposed discipline as too harsh.

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

NO. 2023-B-0888

IN RE: J. QUENTIN SIMON

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to properly supervise a non-lawyer employee, resulting in the employee's embezzlement of funds belonging to respondent. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that J. Quentin Simon, Louisiana Bar Roll number 25502, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent's successful completion of a two-year period of supervised probation governed by the conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

I would impose a six-month suspension fully deferred with a two-year probation.