PATRICIA GOFF AND MARK GOFF v. DR ROBIN YUE (2022)

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

PATRICIA GOFF AND MARK GOFF v. DR. ROBIN L. YUE

CA 22-78

Decided: December 29, 2022

Court composed of Billy Howard Ezell, Jonathan W. Perry, and Gary J. Ortego, Judges.

John Layne Hammons Cornell R. Flournoy William W. Murray, Jr. R. Clayton Christian Nelson & Hammons 705 Milam Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (337) 534-0515 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS: Patricia Goff Mark Goff Steven Wyckoff Harris Harris Law Firm 4407 Parliament Drvie Alexandria, La 71303 (318) 487-1978 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS: Patricia Goff Mark Goff Robert Warren Robison, Jr. Shelby G. LaPlank Watson, Blanche, Wilson & Posner Post Office Drawer 2995 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-2995 (225) 387-5511 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE: Dr. Robin L. Yue

We now grant a rehearing application of Plaintiffs, Patricia and Mark Goff, as to her entitlement to future medical benefits. In our original opinion we failed to address this issue as raised by Plaintiffs.

We find that Patricia Goff is a patient entitled to future medical care and related benefits as authorized by La.R.S. 40:1299.3, to be paid in accordance with La.R.S. 40:1299.3(C) as a result of the breach of the standard of care by Dr. Robin L. Yue on August 5, 2013, and August 6, 2013.

The rehearing application of Patricia and Mark Goff is granted in part, finding Mrs. Goff is entitled to future medical benefits. In all other respects the application for rehearing is denied.

GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.

GARY J. ORTEGO JUDGE

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network