ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY ET AL v. GEORGE MCCORMICK ET AL (2011)

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY, ET AL. v. GEORGE MCCORMICK, ET AL.

10-1225

Decided: March 09, 2011

Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Sylvia R. Cooks, and Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.

William M. Ford P.O. Box 12424 Alexandria, LA 71315-2424(318) 442-8899 Counsel for Defendants/Appellees: Estate of George McCormick and Susan McCormick, Executrix Robert Lewis Bussey Assistant District Attorney P.O. Box 307 Alexandria, LA 71309-0307(318) 449-1937 Counsel for Defendants/Appellees: Charles Wagner James Downs James Buck Clifford Royce Stridder III Rapides Parish District Attorney's Office Elaine McCartney Aubrey McCartney P.O. Box 411 Tioga, LA 71477 Pro Se Robert Kevin McCartney, Individually and on behalf of his minor children, Samantha Nida and Jeremy Gerwaski DWCC H3A 670 Bell Hill Road Homer, LA 71040 Pro Se

The plaintiffs, Aubrey McCartney, Elaine McCartney, and Robert Kevin McCartney, Individually and on behalf of his minor children, all of whom appear in proper person, appeal the trial court's dismissal of their Motion to Refix: Show Cause Hearing Pursuant To Fraud in the September 29, 2008, Judgment in which they sought to have the judgment declared an absolute nullity on the basis of fraud. The trial court denied the Motion to Refix without setting it for a hearing, noting it was “Denied failure to state proper grounds for nullity under La.C.C.P. art.2001-2006.”

On appeal, the plaintiffs filed a Motion [to] Strike and Answer to Appellee's Brief in which they seek to strike the appellees' brief because the appellees did not oppose the Motion to Refix in the trial court and because the brief allegedly includes false statements of fact. The Motion to Strike was referred to the merits of the appeal.

We have thoroughly examined the allegations set forth in the plaintiffs' Motion to Refix and their Motion [to] Strike and the arguments asserted in their appellate brief and find none of their allegations or arguments have any merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ELIZABETH A. PICKETT JUDGE

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network