Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
James R. PAYNE, Sr., et al. v. TONTI REALTY CORPORATION, et al.
This is an appeal by James Payne from a September 29, 1997 district court judgment which:
(1) granted an exception of no cause of action filed by Tonti Realty Corporation (Payne's employer) and Julie Green (Payne's co-worker),
(2) granted an exception of no cause of action filed by the Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corporation, and
(3) granted an exception of no cause of action filed by State Claims Adjusters, Inc.
Payne was injured when struck by a golf cart driven by Green. He filed for workers' compensation benefits, which were paid. The current tort claim, the one now before this Court, is being pursued allegedly in accord with Weber v. State of Louisiana, 635 So.2d 188 (La.1994). We find, as did the trial court, that Payne's claims are drastically different from those involved in Weber; consequently, we affirm the appealed-from judgment.
Payne contends in his tort action that Tonti failed to provide prompt treatment. The compensation act, however, provides a remedy for this in the form of penalties and attorney fees. The claimants in Weber did not have access to these claims as the worker had died before there was a judicial determination of his employer's possible arbitrary and capricious refusal to pay medical expenses. In any event, Weber is to be narrowly applied to the very particular facts of that case and does not allow a tort claim to run counter to the exclusive remedy provision of LSA-R.S. 23:1032.
AFFIRMED.
GAUDIN, Judge.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 98-CA-76.
Decided: June 30, 1998
Court: Court of Appeal of Louisiana,Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)