Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ERICK GARRISON
Considering the great deference afforded to the district court when interpreting an affidavit, I find that the district court did not err in granting the Respondent, defendant Erick Garrison's, motion to suppress evidence where Detective Joseph E. Herman's affidavit is facially deficient in establishing the requisite nexus between the information sought and Garrison's Instagram account. Thus, I respectfully dissent and would deny the writ.
JOHNSON, J., DISSENTS WITH REASONS
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 2025-K-0470
Decided: October 07, 2025
Court: Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)